Monday, June 6, 2011

Open Letter to the Wall Street Journal Bookshelf

This post is in response to this editorial, written by Meghan Cox Gurdon, which is called "Darkness Too Visible" and argues in favor of censorship and book banning, not to mention a culture of silence regarding issues like suicide and self-injury.
 It was with rising incredulousness culminating in angry disbelief that I read June 4th's Bookshelf column, "Darkness Too Visible."

The list of books Ms Gurdon (or whoever on your staff added the sidebar) recommended for parents to encourage their teens to read included Ray Bradbury's dystopian masterpiece Fahrenheit 451. Considering that the article ended by insisting (in a frankly holier-than-thou tone) that book banning/censorship is good for teens and therefore, good for society, one wonders if Ms Gurdon/WSJ Bookshelf editors have read the book. After all, Bradbury's entire philosophical/political purpose for Fahrenheit 451 was illustrate how even the smallest acts of censorship in the name of political correctness can lead to terrible and long-term consequences.

I've read the Twilight series and I used to work in a major bookselling chain (and still end up in a bookstore at least two or three times a month), so I'm well aware of the woeful state of much YA fiction. That, however, is true of any genre.

The important thing to do with teens isn't to tell them "don't read these books," it's to tell them to read. To read constantly. To read anything and everything and then to think critically about what they've read. And it is the parents' job to know what their kids are reading, to read it themselves, and be prepared to discuss issues as necessary. Or, be really revolutionary, and just talk to their kids. Engage in their lives! It's called parenting.

You know whose job it isn't to raise America's children? Book publishers, librarians, booksellers, teachers - none of them are tasked with raising children. You know whose job it is to parent children? Parents. That's why they're called parents.

By all means, parents of America, tell your children that Twilight isn't worth reading because it's a poorly-written piece of crap (I'd use a classier term but it just wouldn't be as apt) whose protagonist is one of the worst female role models in the history of literature. But don't summarily ban them. After all, if nothing else it will just make them want to read the banned books more, if only to see what all the fuss is about. Instead of focusing on what you don't want your kids to read, do some research and find out what book in the YA landscape are worth reading. And despite being in my late twenties, I've been doing a lot of YA reading lately specifically because I'm impressed with the availability of good fiction there - if you know where to look. Be aware enough of what's out there so you can offer alternatives - don't read Twilight, read The Vampire Diaries or better yet, one of LJ Smith's other series, which are even better. Give your kids The Hunger Games trilogy and talk about why what happens in those books is so disturbing and tragic and how we as a society can avoid going the same way. Give your kids Howl's Moving Castle and talk about how awesome it is. Give them Scott Westerfeld's Leviathan and talk about alternate histories and how they can help us look at actual history in a new light. Give them Pride & Prejudice and talk about the pros and cons of Mr Darcy, and why he's a better boyfriend than Edward Cullen.

If you haven't caught on yet, the point is to give your kids books, and then talk to them about the books they're reading.

I also wanted to address Ms Gurdon's point regarding the presence of tough issues like self-injury and suicide in YA fiction. She argues that addressing these issues in fiction for young people is something that should be discouraged and straight-out says that she thinks putting self-injury in a book will encourage other teens to self-injure. This is the only thing in her article that angered me more than the support of censorship. I am a staunch supporter of a non-profit organization called To Write Love on Her Arms, which exists to raise awareness of the issues of depression, addiction, self-injury, and suicide, particularly among teens and young adults. They also work to provide hope and help for people who struggle with those issues. One of the biggest reasons why we need organizations like TWLOHA in the first place is the culture of silence surrounding these issues. We need to encourage conversation about these issues, not discourage it. I struggled in silence with depression for nearly a decade because I was ashamed and afraid of what others would think of me if I reached out for help. It's attitudes like Ms Gurdon's that keep the silence - and the shame - in place.

The major take away from all of this is the following - talk to your children. Parent them yourself. It's your job.

And as Ray Bradbury was trying to say in writing Fahrenheit 451, censorship is never the answer.

Friday, June 3, 2011

Getting Stuff Done

I'm back again, twice in one day! Holy crap!

For one thing, I'm excited because today I finished my first semi-complicated original cross stitch pattern. It's a Doctor Who-themed sampler. Having never done pixel art before, I had to pick that up and then create pixel Doctors and a pixel TARDIS and some pixel Daleks... I also created a smaller TARDIS and a small pixel version of the current "DW" logo. The sampler itself is landscape rather than portrait and is divided into three sections. The top section has an alphabet and numbers then the small TARDIS and small DW logo alternating. The middle section has the larger TARDIS and all eleven Doctors. The bottom section had several RTD-era Daleks and the word "EXTERMINATE" repeating several times.

I'm really looking forward to picking up the rest of the floss I need for it and giving it a try to make sure that all the colors work and everything looks right. It's been a very long time since I did any major cross stitch project.

I'm making Doctor Who cross stitch patterns because my friend Sara and I are hoping to put together a nice selection of Doctor Who items to sell at Doctor Who nights and possibly in an Etsy shop. We're looking into getting things like t-shirts and buttons printed, and then I had the idea of not only cross stitching things which we can sell finished, but also just selling the patterns and/or selling kits with the patterns, fabric, floss, etc. We're still in the stuff-planning stages as opposed to the logistics-planning stages, but it's fun to think about all this stuff.

Meanwhile, in 30 Day Journal Challenge land, today's prompt was to list goals for June:

Journal Challenge - Day 02

Okay, so technically it's already Day 03 but I am currently doing that thing I do when I'm not working or in school where I sleep during the day instead of at night, so for me it's still Day 02? I don't know, lol.

At any rate, the prompt for Day 02 was to list 3-5 goals we hope to accomplish over the course of the challenge. Here's my page:

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Oh, right. I have a blog.

De-lurking (so to speak) on this blog because I'm participating in the 30 Day Journal Challenge put on by Janel at Run with Scissors. And hey, maybe I'll manage to keep updating afterwards.

I am, however, far more active on Tumblr than I am here. *shrugs*

Anyway, here's my journal page for Day 01 of the challenge:

The prompt was to make an introduction page :)

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Commentary/Analysis: Lost 6.01-6.02 - "LA X" | Thoughts: I HAS THEM

HOLY CRAP YOU GUYS.

THIS SHOW IS AWESOME.

Commentary 6.01 & 6.02 "LA X" - Have You Ever Had Deja-Vu?

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Baking Post: Kiss Cookies

I have not yet exhausted my urge to bake, so today I whipped up a batch of what I call Kiss Cookies. The recipe calls them Peanut Blossoms. My name is less boring ;)

Kiss Cookies


Ingredients:
1/2 cup shortening*
1/2 cup peanut butter
1/2 cup white sugar
1/2 cup light brown sugar
1 egg
2 Tbsp milk
1 tsp vanilla**
1 3/4 cups flour
1 tsp baking soda
1/2 tsp salt
Hershey's Kisses

* I used butter, which both my grandma and my Google-Fu told me I could substitute on a one-to-one basis. But you can use Crisco if you want ;)
** Again, I was very generous with the vanilla. In my cookies, it was probably actually closer to a teaspoon and a half.


Method:
01) Cream together the shortening/butter (whichever you use) and the peanut butter.

02) Add in the white and brown sugars and cream well.

03) Add the egg, the milk, and the vanilla and blend well.

04) Sift together (or, if you're lazy like me and can't be arsed to find a sifter, just stir together) the flour, baking soda, and salt. Add dry ingredients gradually to the dough.

05) Roll dough into balls (the size will depend on how much cookie you want surrounding your kisses; I started out kind of small and then started making the balls bigger, close to golf ball size - I prefer the bigger ones). Roll the balls in sugar and place on cookie sheet.

06) Bake at 375 F for approximately 8 minutes. When the cookies have started to crack but are not starting to brown yet, take them out and place one chocolate kiss in the center, pressing down firmly. Return cookies to oven and bake for an additional 2-5 minutes, until golden brown.


NOTE: You should unwrap the kisses before you need to put them on the cookies, because you don't want to take too long to do it before putting them back in the oven. I did it during the first 8 minutes the cookies were in the oven. Also, if you're using stoneware cookie sheets that take extra time the first time around (like I do), it's helpful to let them preheat with the oven so the time isn't as screwy. I just made the dough balls and rolled them in sugar while the cookie sheets were getting hot and put them on a plate until I was ready to put them on the sheets.

YIELD: There isn't an estimated yield in the recipe I used (it's from an old Fireman's Auxillary cookbook from the town my grandparents grew up in, not an "official" cookbook). I got about two and a half dozen, but if I hadn't made the first half-dozen or so as small as I did (which was imho too small), it would have been lower. Probably more like two dozen, give or take.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Baking Post: Chocolate Mint Chip Cookies

Christmas always puts me in a baking mood; specifically, a cookie baking mood. For these cookies, I started out with the recipe you'll find on the back of packages of Andes Creme de Menthe Baking Chips, and then made a few modifications, which I've specified. I'm really happy with the results - they are quite yummy.

Chocolate Mint Chip Cookies
Cookies!


Ingredients:
1/2 cup salted butter (softened)
3/4 cup dark brown sugar
1/2 cup white sugar
1 tsp baking soda
1 tsp baking powder
2 tsp vanilla extract*
3 eggs**
1 pkg Andes Creme de Menthe baking chips
2 1/4 cups flour***
1/2 cup cocoa powder (not dutch process)***


* I am very generous with my definition of "one teaspoon" when it comes to vanilla extract in my cookies. I generally pour directly over the bowl and allow it to overflow noticably with each spoon, lol. But obviously that's a taste thing.
** The original recipe (which is on the back of the Andes Creme de Menthe Baking Chips package, incidentally) calls for 2 eggs. I made it that way the first time and they were fine. This time I added the extra egg to make the cookies slightly more cakey, and I'm really pleased with the result. But your milage may vary.
*** The original recipe is not for chocolate cookies but rather regular ones. It calls for simply 2 2/3 cups flour. I thought it was silly to make mint cookies and not make them chocolate, so I did a little research to gauge flour-to-cocoa ratios in chocolate chocolate chip cookies and decided to slightly lower the amount of flour and add in the half cup of cocoa. I think it turns out lovely, but if you don't want the cookies to be chocolate cookies, stick with the original 2 2/3 cups of flour and don't add cocoa powder!



Method:
1) Blend butter, sugars, baking soda, baking powder, vanilla, and eggs until mixed. Stir in Andes baking chips.

2) In separate bowl, mix flour and cocoa. If you're not using the cocoa, it's still helpful to measure out your flour in a separate bowl, because it's easier to mix it in if you're adding a little at a time.

3) Stir in flour. Because the recipe doesn't call for much butter, the dough is pretty thick. I was using a big spoon from our regular silverware set, but it started to feel like I might bend it if I kept stirring, so I switched to a wooden spoon after adding about half the flour/cocoa mixture.

4) Chill the dough for a while in the fridge. The recipe says "approximately one hour," I think I waited half and hour or forty-five minutes.

5) The recipe says to raise the oven rack one level above middle - I didn't do that. They turned out fine. But in the interest of full disclosure, that's what the recipe says to do.

6) The recipe says "measure out approximately 1 oz. of dough." I don't know about you, but I have no idea what an ounce of cookie dough looks like. Eyeball out an average-sized ball of dough - bigger than a gumball, smaller than a golf ball... if you bake at all, you'll know the drill, lol. If you don't, ummmm... maybe an inch/inch and a half in diameter? Ish? It's not scientific. Flatten the ball slightly and put it on your baking sheet. Non-stick would be infinitely helpful with these cookies.

7) Bake at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for, according to the recipe, 8-10 minutes. Now, I use Pampered Chef stoneware baking sheets, and those take a lot longer the first time (we're talking 20-25 minutes). And then even after the first time, I still left the cookies in for more like 15 minutes. YMMV, do what feels right to you.

NOTE: Be sure to put the dough back in the fridge when you're not actively putting dough on cookie sheets. It gets soft and sticky pretty quickly, and if you don't keep putting it back in the fridge you'll end up with more on your hands and fingertips than on the cookie sheet.

YIELD: I got four dozen cookies exactly plus enough dough for one or two more that I just ate because I didn't want to put a whole cookie sheet in for one or two cookies. This was spot-on their prediction, which also approximated four dozen cookies. And that was with a couple dough-thieves sneaking their fingers in the bowl at least once or twice each, lol.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Note

I'm mostly cross-posting between here and my privately-hosted blog, Broken Satellites. I'm doing this because at this point, I'm not 100% sure I want to stick with paying for hosting for a blog once the hosting I already have runs out (because right now I am TERRIBLE at remembering to blog at all), but in the event that I do move to using Blogger exclusively, I'd like to have the posts archived here as well (because they'll disappear if I'm no longer paying for hosting where they are now).


Also, I wanted to get this name/username while it was still available, I'm not gonna lie.

Switchfoot: Hello Hurricane Tour - Austin 11/18


Okay, so almost a week ago, I left work an hour and a half early and set off for Austin, where an evening of pure awesomosity and win awaited me.

I arrived in Austin about 45 minutes before soundcheck was set to start. The parking lot I found was just around the corner from the alley where the tour bus was parked – basically behind and then a short block over from the venue. It was a tad pricey since I had to pay both the day rate and the night rate added together, but it was close and that was important to me since I was alone. I think this will be my new rule of thumb for shows at small venues in the middle of a city – if at all possible, park within sight of the tour bus. Heh.

Anyway, as soon as I got to the front of the venue (The Parish), I saw someone I recognized from the show I went to in Dallas in August. It’s a husband and wife that go to a gabillion Switchfoot shows any time they swing through Texas/Oklahoma/Louisiana/etc (they live in Houston), and they’re in Friends of the Foot. So Kathy and I had spent a lot of time talking with them before the show in Dallas and then had ended up standing with them during the show. Anyway, Kevin recognized me as well and said “hey, what are you doing here?” to which I responded “what do you think?” Heee. And he of course said “oh, probably the same thing I am.” So at that point I just got in line with them and stuck with them for the most part whenever there was waiting in line involved.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Repost: "Music Rambling"

Today, despite knowing that it was probably a fool’s errand, upon finding out that someone had hidden a copy of Switchfoot’s upcoming single “Mess of Me” in a book in San Antonio’s Central Library (about 30 minutes away from my house), I drove there to check for it. Just, you know, in case. I also figured I could make the trip not a wasted trip by finally getting myself a library card – which I haven’t had in years if you don’t count the fact that my student ID in college was essentially a library card for the university library system.

Anyway, the CD was hidden in a copy of The Dialogues of Plato. So when I got to the library, I went up to the help desk and asked where I could find it – this library is huge, so even knowing where in the Dewey Decimal system the book is wouldn’t help me find it (at least not in a timely manner). I asked the older gentleman behind the desk where I could find the book, and he said “You’re the second person to ask for that book in the last hour.”

I said something along the lines of “darn it, it’ll be gone!” and he asked if it was for a class. I explained about the CD being hidden in the book and he was like “oh, so you’re not here to check out and read Plato’s Dialogues, then.” I said no, and he said I didn’t “look like someone who was into philosophy.”
At which point I reached into my purse, pulled out my copy of Works of Love by Kierkegaard and said “Actually, I’m reading this right now, and the other book in my bag is essays by CS Lewis.”

PWNED.

Then when I got home – new library card in hand (okay, wallet) – I checked my email and discovered that they’ve uploaded the song to the Friends of the Foot website for all the FotF members to download. So I have it anyway! I want to burn some copies myself and hide them around SA – which is what you’re supposed to do if you find one of the copies they’re having hidden all around the world (and then announcing on Twitter), but I’m not sure if the CDs they’re hiding/having hidden just have “Mess of Me” on them or if there’s a b-side that would then be missing from my CDs. Heh.

In other news, the CD player in my car has been out of commission for about a month now, much to my dismay. However, this does mean that I’m listening to the radio again, because I can’t drive without music going. I tend to flip between about nine different stations depending on what’s playing/who’s running commercials. One of the stations in my presets is K-LOVE, a national Christian rock station.
Since I’ve been listening to them more than usual, my discovery of new/new-to-me Christian rock songs has accelerated. Here’s some that are currently PWNING MY SOUL:
Every single one of those had me wiping tears from my eyes the first time I heard them (whilst driving, mind you) and still do now. Actually, I almost had to pull over the first time I heard “Wait and See” because HELLO, MY LIFE. I mean, not the “born in TN, lucky to be alive, wasn’t good in school” part, but if there was anything I needed to hear/be reminded of these days, it’s the chorus to that song – “There is hope for me yet / Because God won’t forget / All the plans He’s made for me / I have to wait and see / He’s not finished with me yet.” I mean, SERIOUSLY. And then the first Chris Tomlin song and the Jeremy Camp song both are about there being no more pain/tears/unhappiness/etc and that always makes me cry. Go figure. And that version of Amazing Grace is BEAUTIFUL.

And now it’s almost my bedtime so I better wrap this up. Check those songs out, you won’t regret it.
ALSO: IF YOU’RE NOT WATCHING GLEE ON FOX, YOU SHOULD BE. TRUST ME. YOU’LL THANK ME LATER.